SEOUL, Jan. 10 (Yonhap) -- South Korea's foreign ministry said Thursday that it has not made any decision yet over Japan's recent request for bilateral diplomatic talks regarding an escalating dispute over Tokyo's wartime forced labor.
The request came after a South Korean court approved the petition last week to seize Korea-based assets of Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal at the request of victims of forced labor during Tokyo's 1910-45 colonial rule.
"We have already told you that the (Seoul) government will review the request prudently," Noh Kyu-duk, the ministry's spokesman, told a regular press briefing.
"No decision has been made yet on details about the diplomatic consultations," he added.
Japan's call for the talks is based on Article III of a 1965 treaty between Seoul and Tokyo that normalized bilateral ties.
It stipulates that the two sides are to settle any dispute related to the treaty primarily through diplomatic channels. Tokyo has argued that all reparation-related issues related to its colonization of South Korea were settled through the treaty.
Last year, the Supreme Court in Seoul ordered the Japanese firm to pay compensation to four South Koreans for their forced labor and unpaid work during World War II. As the firm refused to comply with the ruling, the plaintiffs requested asset seizure.
During his first press conference in the new year earlier in the day, South Korean President Moon Jae-in called on Tokyo to have a "more modest position," attributing the dispute to the two countries' "unfortunate" past.
He reiterated that the government cannot intervene in the judiciary's decision, while noting that it is "undesirable" for Japanese politicians to politicize the issue and escalate it into a controversy.
Cabinet reshuffle sets up Moon administration for 2nd half of term
(News Focus) Allies' decision on combined drills intended to back N.K. diplomacy, but feared to hurt readiness
(News Focus) Varied intentions lie behind N.K. nuclear crusade
(News Focus) N.K. leader eyes image as reliable economic leader
(News Focus) End-of-war declaration likely concession for N.K. denuclearization