SEOUL, March 19 (Yonhap) -- South Korea and the United States have wrapped up the second day of their latest defense cost-sharing talks in Los Angeles, the foreign ministry said Thursday, amid speculation they could extend the talks for another day.
Seoul's top negotiator Jeong Eun-bo and his U.S. counterpart, James DeHart, continued their negotiations Wednesday to determine how much Seoul should pay for the stationing of the 28,500-strong USFK under the cost-sharing deal, called the Special Measures Agreement (SMA).
The two sides initially planned to conduct the talks for two days, but speculation remains they could extend them to make progress amid rising concerns that Korean workers in the USFK could be forced to go on unpaid leave next month absent a deal to bankroll their wages.
Before the seventh round of the negotiations, Seoul's negotiation team prepared to engage in separate negotiations for an arrangement to first address the Korean employees' wage issue in case of a failure to reach a comprehensive SMA.
But the U.S. State Department balked, telling media that it could distract from "expeditiously concluding a mutually acceptable and comprehensive SMA that addresses all facets of the agreement."
Since last September, the two countries have held six rounds of SMA talks, including the last in Washington in January. But they failed to bridge differences over how much Seoul should shoulder this year and beyond and what should be covered by the SMA.
The U.S. has revised downward its initial demand for a fivefold increase of Seoul's financial contribution to the USFK to some $5 billion. But it is known to currently call for about $4 billion, with Seoul insisting on an increase of about 10 percent.
Yoon's outreach to Southeast Asia keeps China in the loop
Allies' defense chiefs highlight watertight alliance based on full extended deterrence against N. Korean threats
(News Focus) Police under fire for lax response to emergency calls hours before Itaewon crush
Police under fire for lax response to emergency calls hours before Itaewon crush
Role of administrative authorities questioned in Itaewon disaster