Go to Contents Go to Navigation

Civic groups slam court's rejection to arrest Samsung's Lee in controversial merger case

All News 15:22 June 09, 2020

SEOUL, June 9 (Yonhap) -- South Korean civic groups criticized a court's decision Tuesday to deny an arrest warrant sought for Samsung Group's de facto leader Lee Jae-yong in a succession-related probe.

Calling the decision "an act that disregards equality before the law," the Seoul-based People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy expressed "deep regret" at the decision made "in the face of the gravity of the criminal allegations" and a risk of him "destroying evidence."

"Imagine how a court would rule if it were an ordinary citizen who committed similar crimes," it said in a statement, arguing that the move is "highly unfair and could only be seen as preferential treatment for Vice Chairman Lee."

In the early hours of Tuesday, the Seoul Central District Court rejected the prosecution's request to put Lee, vice chairman of Samsung Electronics, behind bars, over an on-going probe into a series of allegations, including stock manipulation and violation of capital laws.

He is accused of playing a role in the controversial merger in 2015 between two Samsung affiliates, Cheil Industries Inc. and Samsung C&T, that the prosecutors suspect was designed to help him gain greater control of the country's biggest conglomerate.

Vice Chairman of Samsung Electronics Lee Jae-yong leaves the Seoul Detention Center, located in Uiwang, south of Seoul, on June 9, 2020, after a court denied the issuance of an arrest warrant. (Yonhap)

"The case should be handled in a serious manner," the group said, as it believed that his alleged illegal transactions were aimed at a father-to-son "transfer of power."

Lee is the grandson of Lee Byung-chull, the founder of Samsung Group. His father, Lee Kun-hee, has been incapacitated since he suffered a heart attack in 2014.

The court denied issuing the warrant, on the grounds that there was "insufficient explanation on the need and validity to arrest the defendants against the principle of trial without detention," and that whether Lee is guilty should be determined through "legal battles and court hearings."

Another group, Economic Democracy 21, also released a statement, urging the prosecution to file a request for an arrest warrant again by bolstering evidence.

The court on Tuesday also denied arrest warrants for two other Samsung executives, Choi Gee-sung and Kim Jong-joong, from the group's now-disbanded control tower, the Future Strategy Office, who are suspected of leading the group's efforts to help smooth out the succession process for Lee.


Send Feedback
How can we improve?
Thanks for your feedback!