Go to Contents Go to Navigation

(LEAD) U.S. will support S. Korea's missile defense but decision is up to Seoul: U.S. diplomat

All News 04:26 September 26, 2020

(ATTN: UPDATES with additional background with regard to "defense capabilities" that U.S. Defense Secretary Esper earlier said may include intermediate-range missiles in paras 8-9)
By Byun Duk-kun

WASHINGTON, Sept. 25 (Yonhap) -- The United States will help South Korea prepare against threats posed by intermediate range missiles from its neighbors, but what defense capabilities will be developed and deployed in South Korea will be entirely up to Seoul, a U.S. diplomat in charge of arms reduction said Friday.

"The South Korean government will have to decide for itself what kinds of capabilities it needs to have in order to discharge its responsibilities under our mutual defense agreement. That is something that only the Korean government can decide," Marshall Billingslea, special presidential envoy for arms control, said in an interview with Yonhap News Agency.

The special envoy is set to visit Seoul for two days from Sunday (Seoul time).

The captured image from the website of the U.S. Department of State shows Amb. Marshall Billingslea, special presidential envoy for arms control. (Yonhap)

Billingslea's trip to South Korea will mark the first of its kind since the former treasury official was named the special envoy, and also since the U.S. withdrew from the 1988 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), signed by the former Soviet Union, in August 2019.

The U.S. has since been developing defense capabilities to counter threats posed by medium and intermediate-range missiles held by Russia and also China, the U.S. diplomat said.

"So, the United States, for 33 years, faithfully implemented a Cold War treaty that prohibited the possession of these intermediate-range missile systems. Russia, about halfway through that treaty started to secretly cheat," he said of reasons for U.S. withdrawal from the 1988 treaty.

"China, on the other hand, was never part of any of that. And so for the past 33 years, China has been free to develop all kinds of intermediate-range and medium-range ballistic and cruise missiles, and they have done exactly that," he added.

The U.S. envoy did not specify what U.S. defense capabilities would include, but U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper has said he wanted to deploy conventional ground-based missiles in Asia, prompting concerns that such a move may spark an arms race.

The day after the U.S. pulled out from the INF, the U.S. defense chief said he would like ground-based missiles in Asia "sooner, rather than later."

Billingslea said it will take a "little more time" for the U.S. to develop its defense capabilities, noting the country has been legally able to develop such systems for only about a year since its withdrawal from the INF.

The U.S. will also help develop South Korea's own defense capabilities should the latter chooses to do so.

"South Korea is very sophisticated technologically, and has its own strong industrial base. And so, I would leave it to the South Korean government to decide what it chooses to develop and deploy," he told Yonhap. "We certainly will offer to help in any way we can."

South Korea already houses a U.S. THAAD missile defense base, deployed in 2017.

The U.S. missile defense system seeks to insulate the Asian ally from North Korea's military provocations and threats, but its deployment has led to strong objections and economic retaliation against Seoul from neighboring China.

This image, captured from the Facebook account of the 35th Air Defense Artillery Brigade of the U.S. Forces Korea on April 24, 2019, shows a launcher of an advanced U.S. missile defense system called THAAD. (Yonhap)

The U.S. envoy reiterated the decision to develop or deploy additional capabilities will be up to South Korea, but insisted China's past behavior toward the country may offer a reason to possess such capabilities.

"China demonstrated what a bully it tries to be with Korea, and how it tried to coerce the Republic of Korea," he said, referring to South Korea by its official name.

"And when it comes to China, we are talking about a country that practices intimidation with every one of its neighbors and threatens or actually in some cases uses force to exert its will and to redraw borders and boundaries," added Billingslea.

Such a view on China has increasingly been echoed by other top U.S. officials, who have stressed a need to form a regional alliance in the Indo-Pacific region to counter what they called "aggressions" from the Chinese communist party in all fronts.

"I think you are seeing the entire world begin to unite around the central understanding that the Chinese Communist Party simply is going to refuse to compete in a fair, reciprocal, transparent way," Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said.

The U.S. is currently in dialogue with Australia, India and Japan in a four-way forum known as the Quad to build what it says will be a NATO-like multilateral structure in the region, and is pushing to expand the forum into Quad Plus by including others such as South Korea, Vietnam and New Zealand.

Billingslea said he was unaware of the exact architecture of the envisioned multilateral structure, but highlighted the importance of U.S. allies in the region working together when necessary.

"I think the more important aspect here is that democracies have to stick together in the face of dictatorial bully, and democracies need to work together to make sure that we support one another and that and that we share collected defenses when we can," he said.

Korea is facing a huge choice over whether to go along with a U.S. multilateral military alliance


Send Feedback
How can we improve?
Thanks for your feedback!